PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBND vs. DBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBND vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBND achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.21% return.


VBND

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.57%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
0.41%
10Y*
1.58%

DBND

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBND vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VBND
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF
0.39%7.31%1.26%8.16%-6.92%
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
-0.21%7.41%3.06%6.33%-5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VBND and DBND is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022

0.87

The correlation between VBND and DBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBND vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBND
VBND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

DBND
DBND Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBND vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBNDDBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.72

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

5.10

+0.31

VBND vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBND and DBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBNDDBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.48

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.48

-0.17

Drawdowns

VBND vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than DBND's maximum drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and DBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBNDDBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-9.39%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-2.83%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.60%

-6.25%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-1.80%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-2.27%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.95%

+0.10%

Volatility

VBND vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.07%. This indicates that VBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBNDDBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.07%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

2.33%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

3.30%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.12%

5.09%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.45%

5.09%

+0.36%

VBND vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBND vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than DBND's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
4.79%4.78%5.19%4.39%2.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBND
Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF
4.23%4.22%4.41%3.88%2.55%1.56%1.98%3.14%2.82%2.00%3.12%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBND and DBND have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBND has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBND dropped -18.97% vs DBND's -9.39%.

On 3-year performance, VBND leads with 4.74% vs 4.50% for DBND. On fees, VBND is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VBND has performed better with a 4.74% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBND is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.23% for VBND.

VBND tracks Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index, while DBND tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 0.50% for DBND.

DBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBND and DBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer