VBND vs. BNDP
VBND (Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF) and BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - VBND tracks the Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index while BNDP tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBND charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDP.
Performance
VBND vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBND achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than BNDP's 0.34% return.
VBND
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 5.65%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VBND vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 0.39% | 0.37% |
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBND and BNDP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBND vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank
VBND
BNDP
VBND vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF (VBND) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBND | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBND | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.25 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
VBND vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBND drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBND and BNDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBND | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -2.60% | -16.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -1.31% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -0.86% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | — | — |
Volatility
VBND vs. BNDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBND | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 3.63% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 3.63% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 3.63% | +1.82% |
VBND vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBND has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBND vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison
VBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than BNDP's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.08% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBND Vident U.S. Bond Strategy ETF | 4.23% | 4.22% | 4.41% | 3.88% | 2.55% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 2.82% | 2.00% | 3.12% | 1.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBND and BNDP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for VBND.
VBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.
VBND tracks Vident Core U.S. Bond Strategy Index, while BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for VBND and 0.05% for BNDP.
Find the right allocation for VBND and BNDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer