VBMPX vs. FNCMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VBMPX (Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both mutual funds - VBMPX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Vanguard, while FNCMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Over the past 10 years, VBMPX returned 1.58%/yr vs 19.45%/yr for FNCMX. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. VBMPX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

VBMPX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VBMPX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBMPX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 16.82% return. Over the past 10 years, VBMPX has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.45% annualized return.

VBMPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.36%
• 1Y: 5.36%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: 0.23%
• 10Y*: 1.58%

FNCMX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 8.17%
• YTD: 16.82%
• 6M: 15.82%
• 1Y: 40.51%
• 3Y*: 27.91%
• 5Y*: 15.70%
• 10Y*: 19.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBMPX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VBMPX Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares	0.43%	7.18%	1.27%	5.75%	-13.14%	-1.95%	7.75%	8.74%	-0.24%	3.58%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	16.82%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VBMPX and FNCMX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2010	-0.14

The correlation between VBMPX and FNCMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VBMPX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBMPX

VBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 23
VBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
VBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
VBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
VBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
VBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBMPX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VBMPX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VBMPX	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	2.58	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.36	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	3.22	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.61	12.65	-7.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VBMPX vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBMPX and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VBMPX	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	2.58	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.70	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.89	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.58	-0.06

Drawdowns

VBMPX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBMPX drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBMPX and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VBMPX	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-55.08%	+36.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.89%	-13.01%	+10.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.99%	-24.20%	+18.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.12%	-35.64%	+17.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.90%	-35.64%	+16.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.23%	0.00%	-2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-7.86%	+4.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	3.30%	-2.34%

Volatility

VBMPX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VBMPX) is 1.38%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that VBMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VBMPX	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.38%	4.12%	-2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.80%	12.10%	-9.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.97%	16.23%	-12.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.02%	22.46%	-16.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.98%	22.05%	-17.07%

VBMPX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBMPX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VBMPX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

VBMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than FNCMX's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.44%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%
VBMPX Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares	4.00%	3.88%	3.69%	3.11%	2.61%	1.81%	2.41%	2.75%	2.58%	2.58%	2.55%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VBMPX and FNCMX in my portfolio?

VBMPX and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VBMPX or FNCMX?

FNCMX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to VBMPX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBMPX dropped -18.90% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.