PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBMFX vs. VBILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBMFX vs. VBILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (VBMFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBMFX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than VBILX's -0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VBMFX has underperformed VBILX with an annualized return of 1.46%, while VBILX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.91% annualized return.


VBMFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.29%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
1.46%

VBILX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
1.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBMFX vs. VBILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBMFX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
0.38%7.05%1.15%5.62%-13.25%-2.04%7.63%8.61%-0.34%3.45%
VBILX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
-0.05%8.57%1.54%6.09%-13.59%-2.36%9.82%10.20%-0.15%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VBMFX and VBILX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2001

0.95

The correlation between VBMFX and VBILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBMFX vs. VBILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBMFX
VBMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VBMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VBMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VBILX
VBILX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VBILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBILX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VBILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBILX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBMFX vs. VBILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (VBMFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBMFXVBILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.49

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

4.50

+0.93

VBMFX vs. VBILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBMFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the VBILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBMFX and VBILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBMFXVBILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.05

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.36

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.67

+0.29

Drawdowns

VBMFX vs. VBILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBMFX drawdown since its inception was -19.08%, roughly equal to the maximum VBILX drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBMFX and VBILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBMFXVBILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.08%

-19.26%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-3.43%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.02%

-6.05%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-19.15%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.08%

-19.26%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-1.84%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-3.16%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.13%

-0.17%

Volatility

VBMFX vs. VBILX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (VBMFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBILX) have volatilities of 1.37% and 1.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBMFXVBILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

1.44%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

3.00%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

4.16%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

6.39%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

5.36%

-0.38%

VBMFX vs. VBILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBMFX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VBILX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBMFX vs. VBILX - Dividend Comparison

VBMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than VBILX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBILX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.21%4.01%3.80%3.09%1.99%3.39%2.94%2.73%2.87%2.73%3.06%3.09%
VBMFX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
3.87%3.76%3.57%2.99%2.49%1.72%2.31%2.63%2.47%2.45%2.43%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VBMFX and VBILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBILX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to VBMFX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBMFX dropped -19.08% vs VBILX's -19.26%.

VBMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBMFX and VBILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer