VBLIX vs. PG
VBLIX (Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus) is Total Bond Market fund managed by Vanguard, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VBLIX returned 0.73%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for PG. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VBLIX vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBLIX achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 6.81% return. Over the past 10 years, VBLIX has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 0.73%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.
VBLIX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 1.62%
- 5Y*
- -3.89%
- 10Y*
- 0.73%
PG
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- -3.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
VBLIX vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBLIX Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus | 0.27% | 6.61% | -4.11% | 6.78% | -27.20% | -3.08% | 16.29% | 19.16% | -4.70% | 10.90% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 6.81% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBLIX and PG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2011 | 0.00 |
Over the past year, VBLIX and PG have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBLIX vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
VBLIX
PG
VBLIX vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBLIX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBLIX | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.98 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | -0.23 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | -0.43 | +2.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBLIX vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBLIX drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBLIX and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBLIX | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -54.25% | +15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.98% | -15.52% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.90% | -21.15% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.49% | -23.77% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.61% | -23.77% | -14.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.88% | -12.57% | -12.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.55% | -12.16% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 8.48% | -6.09% |
Volatility
VBLIX vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus (VBLIX) is 2.11%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that VBLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBLIX | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 7.62% | -5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.89% | 15.05% | -9.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.13% | 18.92% | -10.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 17.86% | -5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.59% | 19.08% | -7.49% |
Dividends
VBLIX vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
VBLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than PG's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.82% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
VBLIX Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Plus | 4.79% | 4.67% | 4.64% | 3.42% | 4.17% | 2.89% | 5.85% | 3.63% | 3.83% | 3.71% | 4.20% | 5.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBLIX and PG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to VBLIX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBLIX dropped -38.61% vs PG's -54.25%.
VBLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBLIX and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer