PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VBK has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 11.74%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


VBK

1D
-1.06%
1M
4.84%
YTD
17.41%
6M
16.96%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
11.74%

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBK vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
17.41%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and VTV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.79

The correlation between VBK and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VBK vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
VTV

Technology

25.9%
13.4%

Industrials

24.7%
14.0%

Healthcare

15.3%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
4.0%

Financial Services

5.6%
22.3%

Energy

4.8%
8.1%

Real Estate

3.9%
2.8%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
9.4%

Utilities

1.2%
5.2%

Technology

VBK
25.9%
VTV
13.4%

Industrials

VBK
24.7%
VTV
14.0%

Healthcare

VBK
15.3%
VTV
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
9.6%
VTV
4.0%

Financial Services

VBK
5.6%
VTV
22.3%

Energy

VBK
4.8%
VTV
8.1%

Real Estate

VBK
3.9%
VTV
2.8%

Communication Services

VBK
3.5%
VTV
3.3%

Basic Materials

VBK
3.2%
VTV
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.4%
VTV
9.4%

Utilities

VBK
1.2%
VTV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBK vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBKVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

4.15

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

15.69

-4.71

VBK vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBKVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.61

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.81

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.75

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.51

-0.08

Drawdowns

VBK vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-59.27%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-6.35%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-14.52%

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-17.04%

-21.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-36.78%

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

0.00%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-7.87%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.68%

+1.31%

Volatility

VBK vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

2.52%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

7.55%

+7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

10.11%

+9.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

13.88%

+9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

16.67%

+6.19%

VBK vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBK vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBK and VTV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBK has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 11.74% for VBK. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VBK.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

VBK is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VBK and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer