PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBIMX vs. VWELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBIMX vs. VWELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) and Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VWELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBIMX achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than VWELX's 6.39% return. Over the past 10 years, VBIMX has underperformed VWELX with an annualized return of 1.89%, while VWELX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.


VBIMX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
1.89%

VWELX

1D
-0.67%
1M
2.71%
YTD
6.39%
6M
6.66%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBIMX vs. VWELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBIMX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
-0.33%8.59%1.55%5.78%-13.25%-2.50%9.83%10.22%-0.13%3.89%
VWELX
Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares
6.39%16.54%14.73%14.29%-14.36%18.99%10.57%22.51%-3.43%13.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VBIMX and VWELX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2006

-0.07

The correlation between VBIMX and VWELX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBIMX vs. VWELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBIMX
VBIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VBIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VWELX
VWELX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VWELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWELX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VWELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWELX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBIMX vs. VWELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) and Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VWELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBIMXVWELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.99

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

13.88

-9.66

VBIMX vs. VWELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBIMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the VWELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBIMX and VWELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBIMXVWELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.41

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.78

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.88

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.84

-0.17

Drawdowns

VBIMX vs. VWELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBIMX drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum VWELX drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBIMX and VWELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBIMXVWELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.07%

-36.12%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-6.78%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-11.98%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

-20.88%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.07%

-25.33%

+6.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-0.67%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-3.92%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.46%

-0.32%

Volatility

VBIMX vs. VWELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) is 1.41%, while Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VWELX) has a volatility of 2.61%. This indicates that VBIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBIMXVWELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

2.61%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

6.68%

-3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

8.41%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

11.14%

-4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.38%

11.53%

-6.15%

VBIMX vs. VWELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBIMX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VWELX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBIMX vs. VWELX - Dividend Comparison

VBIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than VWELX's 10.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBIMX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.25%4.03%3.82%2.82%2.41%3.23%2.95%2.75%2.89%2.76%3.08%3.12%
VWELX
Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor Shares
10.83%11.46%10.76%6.01%8.19%8.64%7.77%4.67%9.49%5.82%4.44%7.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBIMX and VWELX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWELX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to VBIMX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBIMX dropped -19.07% vs VWELX's -36.12%.

VWELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBIMX and VWELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer