PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBIMX vs. BIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBIMX vs. BIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBIMX achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than BIV's -0.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBIMX having a 1.63% annualized return and BIV not far ahead at 1.71%.


VBIMX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.35%
6M
-1.11%
YTD
-1.32%
1Y
1.07%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*
1.63%
ALL TIME*
3.62%

BIV

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.95%
6M
-0.57%
YTD
-0.71%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
-0.28%
10Y*
1.71%
ALL TIME*
3.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$101.25M$129.17M$122.60M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VBIMX vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBIMX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
-1.32%8.59%1.55%5.78%-13.25%-2.50%9.83%10.22%-0.13%3.89%
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.71%8.52%1.57%6.07%-13.21%-2.40%9.67%10.34%-0.19%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VBIMX and BIV is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.92

The correlation between VBIMX and BIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBIMX vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VBIMX
VBIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VBIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VBIMX vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBIMXBIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.07

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

0.51

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

1.22

+0.21

VBIMX vs. BIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBIMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the BIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBIMX and BIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBIMX vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBIMX drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, roughly equal to the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBIMX and BIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBIMXBIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.07%

-18.95%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-3.18%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.20%

-5.21%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.51%

-18.45%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.07%

-18.95%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-2.50%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-3.38%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.33%

+0.11%

Volatility

VBIMX vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBIMX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) have volatilities of 1.05% and 1.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBIMXBIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.08%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.26%

3.18%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

3.91%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

6.41%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.38%

5.50%

-0.12%

VBIMX vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBIMX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBIMX vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison

VBIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than BIV's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.32%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
VBIMX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
3.97%4.03%3.82%2.82%2.41%3.23%2.95%2.75%2.89%2.76%3.08%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VBIMX and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BIV has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to VBIMX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBIMX dropped -19.07% vs BIV's -18.95%.

VBIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBIMX and BIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer