PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBIL vs. BNDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VBIL vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VBIL vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBIL achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's 0.09% return.


VBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.87%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNDW

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VBIL vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBIL has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

VBIL vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBIL vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBILBNDWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

12.78

0.95

+11.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

29.76

1.34

+28.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

12.77

1.17

+11.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

43.72

1.35

+42.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

377.55

4.95

+372.61

VBIL vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBIL Sharpe Ratio is 12.78, which is higher than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBIL and BNDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBILBNDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78

0.95

+11.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

13.10

0.37

+12.73

Correlation

The correlation between VBIL and BNDW is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

VBIL vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

VBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than BNDW's 4.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.66%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.18%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%

Drawdowns

VBIL vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.09%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBIL and BNDW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VBILBNDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-17.22%

+17.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.09%

-2.70%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.85%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.05%

+5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.73%

-0.72%

Volatility

VBIL vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) is 0.07%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that VBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VBILBNDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

1.67%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.16%

2.29%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32%

3.53%

-3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.31%

5.17%

-4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.31%

4.92%

-4.61%