VBG.NEO vs. URA
VBG.NEO (Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-hedged)) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBG.NEO is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (CAD Hedged), while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBG.NEO returned 0.33%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for URA. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. VBG.NEO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
VBG.NEO vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VBG.NEO is traded in CAD, while URA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBG.NEO achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VBG.NEO has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 0.33%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 16.24% annualized return.
VBG.NEO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- -0.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.83%
- 5Y*
- -1.35%
- 10Y*
- 0.33%
URA
- 1D
- -9.70%
- 1M
- -20.49%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 45.89%
- 3Y*
- 35.53%
- 5Y*
- 22.30%
- 10Y*
- 16.24%
VBG.NEO vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBG.NEO Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-hedged) | -0.27% | 0.14% | 1.68% | 6.85% | -13.38% | -3.03% | 3.87% | 6.33% | 1.34% | 1.78% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 7.71% | 59.51% | 7.96% | 43.02% | -5.00% | 56.15% | 38.94% | -8.28% | -15.50% | 11.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBG.NEO and URA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBG.NEO vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
VBG.NEO
URA
VBG.NEO vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VBG.NEO) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBG.NEO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.18 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 1.64 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 3.46 | -4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBG.NEO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 0.92 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.54 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.46 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.01 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
VBG.NEO vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -90.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBG.NEO and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBG.NEO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -90.50% | +73.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -28.13% | +24.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.17% | -35.85% | +32.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.66% | -35.85% | +19.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.31% | -57.17% | +39.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.05% | -27.46% | +18.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -69.53% | +64.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 13.30% | -11.99% |
Volatility
VBG.NEO vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VBG.NEO) is 1.84%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 16.53%. This indicates that VBG.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBG.NEO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.84% | 16.53% | -14.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 38.59% | -35.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 49.99% | -46.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 41.39% | -36.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 35.51% | -30.89% |
VBG.NEO vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBG.NEO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBG.NEO vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
VBG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than URA's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.60% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
VBG.NEO Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-hedged) | 3.61% | 3.46% | 3.25% | 3.44% | 1.14% | 2.91% | 0.64% | 2.54% | 2.34% | 1.74% | 1.41% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBG.NEO and URA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBG.NEO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBG.NEO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
VBG.NEO is categorized as Global Bonds, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. VBG.NEO tracks Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (CAD Hedged), while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VBG.NEO and 0.69% for URA.
Find the right allocation for VBG.NEO and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer