VBCI vs. FLDR
VBCI (Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCI is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2035 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while FLDR is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBCI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.
Performance
VBCI vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCI
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FLDR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.20%
VBCI vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCI Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.74% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCI and FLDR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCI vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
VBCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLDR
VBCI vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCI) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCI | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 62.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCI vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCI drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum FLDR drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCI and FLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCI | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -12.23% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -0.12% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -0.35% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility
VBCI vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCI | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.35% | 0.81% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 1.21% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 5.22% | +0.13% |
VBCI vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCI vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
VBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than FLDR's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.33% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% |
VBCI Vanguard Target Maturity 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCI and FLDR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBCI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBCI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLDR.
FLDR has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 1.29% for VBCI.
VBCI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLDR is Short-Term Bond. VBCI tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCI and 0.15% for FLDR.
Find the right allocation for VBCI and FLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer