PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCH vs. PCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCH vs. PCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCH) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VBCH

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.42%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCL

1D
-0.30%
1M
-1.79%
6M
-0.66%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCH vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBCH and PCL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCH vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCH) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VBCH vs. PCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBCH vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCH drawdown since its inception was -2.05%, smaller than the maximum PCL drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCH and PCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCHPCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-5.14%

+3.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-2.85%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-1.70%

+1.16%

Volatility

VBCH vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCHPCLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.80%

7.84%

-3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.80%

7.84%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.80%

7.84%

-3.04%

VBCH vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBCH vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison

VBCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than PCL's 5.86% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VBCH and PCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VBCH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VBCH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.

PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 1.32% for VBCH.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCH and 0.25% for PCL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCH and PCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer