VBCH vs. LQDH
VBCH (Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. VBCH is passively managed, while LQDH is actively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VBCH charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
VBCH vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCH
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.25M | $5.35M | $3.78M | |
| $105.55K | $286.07K | $238.96K |
VBCH vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCH Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.32% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCH and LQDH is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCH vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
VBCH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQDH
VBCH vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCH) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCH | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCH vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCH drawdown since its inception was -2.05%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCH and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCH | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -24.63% | +22.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -0.49% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -1.66% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility
VBCH vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCH | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.65% | 2.61% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 4.39% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 6.42% | -1.77% |
VBCH vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCH vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
VBCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than LQDH's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.93% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
VBCH Vanguard Target Maturity 2034 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCH and LQDH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBCH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBCH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 1.33% for VBCH.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCH and 0.25% for LQDH.
Find the right allocation for VBCH and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer