VBCG vs. VCIT
VBCG (Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF) and VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from Vanguard - VBCG tracks the ICE 2033 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index while VCIT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VBCG charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VCIT.
Performance
VBCG vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCG
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCIT
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
VBCG vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.02% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCG and VCIT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCG vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank
VBCG
VCIT
VBCG vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCG) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCG | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.75 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
VBCG vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCG drawdown since its inception was -1.90%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCG and VCIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCG | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.90% | -20.56% | +18.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -1.78% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -3.16% | +2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility
VBCG vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCG | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 4.11% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 6.61% | -2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 6.28% | -1.70% |
VBCG vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCG vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison
VBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than VCIT's 4.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.82% | 4.62% | 4.43% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VBCG and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCG.
VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 0.84% for VBCG.
VBCG tracks ICE 2033 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCG and 0.03% for VCIT.
Find the right allocation for VBCG and VCIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer