PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCG vs. PCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCG vs. PCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCG) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VBCG

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.45%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCL

1D
-0.30%
1M
-1.79%
6M
-0.66%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCG vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBCG and PCL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCG vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCG) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VBCG vs. PCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBCG vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCG drawdown since its inception was -1.90%, smaller than the maximum PCL drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCG and PCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCGPCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-5.14%

+3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-2.85%

+1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-1.70%

+1.18%

Volatility

VBCG vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCGPCLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

7.84%

-3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.35%

7.84%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.35%

7.84%

-3.49%

VBCG vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBCG vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison

VBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than PCL's 5.86% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VBCG and PCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VBCG is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VBCG is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.

PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 1.20% for VBCG.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCG and 0.25% for PCL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCG and PCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer