VBCG vs. LQDH

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VBCG (Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. VBCG is passively managed, while LQDH is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBCG charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.

Performance

VBCG vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VBCG

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQDH

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 2.19%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 7.49%
• 3Y*: 8.04%
• 5Y*: 5.26%
• 10Y*: 4.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCG vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF	1.02%
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF	2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VBCG and LQDH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

VBCG vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDH

LQDH Risk / Return Rank: 82
LQDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
LQDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LQDH Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LQDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LQDH Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCG vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VBCG	LQDH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	0.58	+0.60

Drawdowns

VBCG vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCG drawdown since its inception was -1.90%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCG and LQDH.

Drawdown Indicators

	VBCG	LQDH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.90%	-24.63%	+22.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.86%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-7.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-0.20%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.52%	-1.67%	+1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VBCG	LQDH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.58%	2.71%	+1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.58%	4.41%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.58%	6.44%	-1.86%

VBCG vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCG has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VBCG vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison

VBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than LQDH's 5.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF	5.96%	6.06%	7.57%	7.69%	3.73%	1.65%	2.22%	3.09%	5.08%	2.37%	2.33%	2.98%
VBCG Vanguard Target Maturity 2033 Corporate Bond ETF	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VBCG and LQDH in my portfolio?

VBCG and LQDH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VBCG or LQDH?

On fees, VBCG is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VBCG or LQDH?

VBCG is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VBCG or LQDH?

LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.96%, compared with 0.84% for VBCG.

What is the main difference between VBCG and LQDH?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCG and 0.25% for LQDH.