VBCB vs. VT
VBCB (Vanguard Target Maturity 2028 Corporate Bond ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2028 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBCB charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
VBCB vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
VBCB vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCB Vanguard Target Maturity 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.05% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 15.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCB and VT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCB vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
VBCB
VT
VBCB vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCB) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCB | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.27 | 0.44 | +3.83 |
Drawdowns
VBCB vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCB drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCB and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCB | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -50.27% | +49.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.88% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -7.02% | +6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.17% | — |
Volatility
VBCB vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCB | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36% | 12.70% | -11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.36% | 16.05% | -14.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.36% | 17.23% | -15.87% |
VBCB vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCB has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCB vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
VBCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCB Vanguard Target Maturity 2028 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCB and VT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCB.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.42% for VBCB.
VBCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VT is Global Equities. VBCB tracks ICE 2028 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCB and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for VBCB and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer