PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCB vs. PCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCB vs. PCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCB) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VBCB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.35%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCL

1D
0.03%
1M
1.83%
YTD
2.77%
6M
2.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCB vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBCB and PCL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCB vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCB) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VBCB vs. PCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBCB vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCB drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum PCL drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCB and PCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCBPCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-5.14%

+4.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.22%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-1.71%

+1.63%

Volatility

VBCB vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCBPCLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46%

7.83%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.46%

7.83%

-6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.46%

7.83%

-6.37%

VBCB vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCB has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBCB vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison

VBCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than PCL's 5.24% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


VBCB and PCL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VBCB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VBCB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.

PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 0.42% for VBCB.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCB and 0.25% for PCL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCB and PCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer