VB vs. SEEGX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) and SEEGX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund) are both funds - VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index, while SEEGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. VB is passively managed, while SEEGX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VB returned 11.61%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for SEEGX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SEEGX.

Performance

VB vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than SEEGX's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, VB has underperformed SEEGX with an annualized return of 11.61%, while SEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.51% annualized return.

VB

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 5.17%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 6M: 13.69%
• 1Y: 30.83%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 6.98%
• 10Y*: 11.61%

SEEGX

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: 3.07%
• 6M: 2.90%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: 21.32%
• 5Y*: 12.20%
• 10Y*: 19.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. SEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	15.33%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund	3.07%	14.08%	35.14%	34.62%	-25.40%	18.17%	56.02%	39.13%	0.50%	38.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and SEEGX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between VB and SEEGX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VB vs. SEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 64
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 73

SEEGX

SEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 15
SEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
SEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
SEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VB	SEEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	0.91	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	1.30	+1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.17	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	0.88	+2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.80	2.50	+9.30

VB vs. SEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the SEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and SEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VB vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, roughly equal to the maximum SEEGX drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and SEEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VB	SEEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.56%	-62.09%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.98%	-16.82%	+7.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.36%	-21.50%	-3.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.15%	-31.23%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.05%	-31.85%	-10.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.43%	+4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-16.89%	+8.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	5.93%	-3.49%

Volatility

VB vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 5.41%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VB	SEEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	6.19%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.24%	12.37%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	16.42%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.80%	20.31%	+0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.44%	21.65%	-0.21%

VB vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

VB vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than SEEGX's 11.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SEEGX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund	11.10%	11.44%	2.00%	0.12%	3.42%	14.92%	5.27%	12.85%	15.97%	14.79%	9.88%	4.49%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.18%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VB and SEEGX in my portfolio?

VB and SEEGX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VB or SEEGX?

SEEGX has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to VB (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs SEEGX's -62.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.