PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VB vs. SCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VB vs. SCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than SCHI's -0.06% return.


VB

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.48%
6M
7.51%
YTD
14.83%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.93%
ALL TIME*
9.88%

SCHI

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.47%
6M
-0.06%
YTD
-0.06%
1Y
4.22%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VB vs. SCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.83%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%10.99%
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
-0.06%9.47%3.32%8.97%-14.06%-1.85%9.74%0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VB and SCHI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.27

The correlation between VB and SCHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VB vs. SCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHI
SCHI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VB vs. SCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBSCHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.41

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

4.30

+4.87

VB vs. SCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VB Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the SCHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VB and SCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VB vs. SCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than SCHI's maximum drawdown of -20.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and SCHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBSCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.56%

-20.67%

-38.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-3.01%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.36%

-5.97%

-19.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-20.67%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-1.61%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-5.63%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

0.99%

+1.48%

Volatility

VB vs. SCHI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) at 1.16%. This indicates that VB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBSCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

1.16%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

3.30%

+8.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

4.14%

+12.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

6.67%

+14.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

7.35%

+14.02%

VB vs. SCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VB vs. SCHI - Dividend Comparison

VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than SCHI's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
5.09%4.99%5.11%4.27%3.10%1.93%2.31%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.23%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


VB and SCHI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VB has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to SCHI (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs SCHI's -20.67%.

On 5-year performance, VB leads with 7.48% vs 0.88% for SCHI. On fees, SCHI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VB has performed better with a 7.48% return vs 0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VB.

SCHI has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 1.23% for VB.

VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHI is Corporate Bonds. VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index, while SCHI tracks Bloomberg US 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.03% for SCHI.

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VB and SCHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer