VB vs. AMID
VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) and AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index, while AMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Argent. VB is passively managed, while AMID is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VB returned 16.14%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for AMID. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for AMID.
Performance
VB vs. AMID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VB achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than AMID's 7.01% return.
VB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
AMID
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 11.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VB vs. AMID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.33% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -10.31% |
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF | 7.01% | -1.39% | 13.06% | 31.26% | -7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between VB and AMID is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between VB and AMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
VB vs. AMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VB
AMID
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Industrials
VB
AMID
Technology
VB
AMID
Financial Services
VB
AMID
Consumer Cyclical
VB
AMID
Healthcare
VB
AMID
Real Estate
VB
AMID
Basic Materials
VB
AMID
Energy
VB
AMID
Consumer Defensive
VB
AMID
Utilities
VB
AMID
Communication Services
VB
AMID
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VB vs. AMID — Risk / Return Rank
VB
AMID
VB vs. AMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) and Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VB | AMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.11 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 0.80 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.80 | 2.78 | +9.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VB vs. AMID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VB drawdown since its inception was -59.56%, which is greater than AMID's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VB and AMID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VB | AMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.56% | -23.32% | -36.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -12.31% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.36% | -23.32% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.91% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -6.19% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 3.56% | -1.12% |
Volatility
VB vs. AMID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) is 5.41%, while Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that VB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VB | AMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 5.84% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 12.80% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.68% | 16.59% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 19.17% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 19.17% | +2.27% |
VB vs. AMID - Expense Ratio Comparison
VB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AMID's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
VB vs. AMID - Dividend Comparison
VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than AMID's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VB and AMID move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AMID has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to VB (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VB dropped -59.56% vs AMID's -23.32%.
On 3-year performance, VB leads with 16.14% vs 11.79% for AMID. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VB has performed better with a 16.14% return vs 11.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.
VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.33% for AMID.
VB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AMID is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VB and 0.52% for AMID.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VB and AMID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer