PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAW vs. VONE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAW vs. VONE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than VONE's 9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has underperformed VONE with an annualized return of 10.67%, while VONE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.


VAW

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.70%
YTD
13.13%
6M
11.82%
1Y
24.61%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
10.67%

VONE

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.31%
YTD
9.48%
6M
9.01%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAW vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
13.13%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
9.48%17.21%24.51%26.41%-19.14%26.49%20.95%31.12%-4.84%21.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VAW and VONE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.79

The correlation between VAW and VONE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VAW vs. VONE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAW
VONE

Basic Materials

90.1%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
10.3%

Industrials

1.1%
9.2%

Healthcare

0.5%
8.7%

Technology

0.1%
33.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
4.8%

Energy

0.0%
3.7%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Basic Materials

VAW
90.1%
VONE
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VAW
8.3%
VONE
10.3%

Industrials

VAW
1.1%
VONE
9.2%

Healthcare

VAW
0.5%
VONE
8.7%

Technology

VAW
0.1%
VONE
33.9%

Consumer Defensive

VAW
0.0%
VONE
4.8%

Energy

VAW
0.0%
VONE
3.7%

Communication Services

VAW

-

VONE
10.9%

Financial Services

VAW

-

VONE
11.9%

Real Estate

VAW

-

VONE
2.2%

Utilities

VAW

-

VONE
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAW vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VONE
VONE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAW vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAWVONEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.94

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

13.14

-7.29

VAW vs. VONE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the VONE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAW and VONE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAW vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, which is greater than VONE's maximum drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VONE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAWVONEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.17%

-34.66%

-27.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-8.85%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.21%

-19.06%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-25.12%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-34.66%

-6.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-1.67%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-3.90%

-5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

1.98%

+2.24%

Volatility

VAW vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) at 4.51%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAWVONEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

4.51%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

9.76%

+4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

12.52%

+5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.70%

17.16%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.27%

18.29%

+2.98%

VAW vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAW vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison

VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than VONE's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.36%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
1.03%1.07%1.20%1.40%1.59%1.16%1.45%1.65%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAW and VONE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAW has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to VONE (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VONE's -34.66%.

On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 15.46% vs 10.67% for VAW. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VONE has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VAW.

VAW has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.03% for VONE.

VAW is categorized as Materials, while VONE is Large Cap Blend Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VAW and 0.08% for VONE.

VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAW and VONE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer