VAW vs. VONE
VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) and VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VONE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAW returned 10.67%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for VONE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VAW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VONE.
Performance
VAW vs. VONE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than VONE's 9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has underperformed VONE with an annualized return of 10.67%, while VONE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.
VAW
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
VONE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
VAW vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 13.13% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 9.48% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 26.41% | -19.14% | 26.49% | 20.95% | 31.12% | -4.84% | 21.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAW and VONE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VAW and VONE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VAW vs. VONE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAW
VONE
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
VAW
VONE
Consumer Cyclical
VAW
VONE
Industrials
VAW
VONE
Healthcare
VAW
VONE
Technology
VAW
VONE
Consumer Defensive
VAW
VONE
Energy
VAW
VONE
Communication Services
VAW
-
VONE
Financial Services
VAW
-
VONE
Real Estate
VAW
-
VONE
Utilities
VAW
-
VONE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAW vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank
VAW
VONE
VAW vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VAW | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.94 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 13.14 | -7.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VAW vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, which is greater than VONE's maximum drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and VONE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAW | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -34.66% | -27.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -8.85% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.21% | -19.06% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -25.12% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.13% | -34.66% | -6.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -1.67% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -3.90% | -5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 1.98% | +2.24% |
Volatility
VAW vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) at 4.51%. This indicates that VAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAW | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 4.51% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 9.76% | +4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 12.52% | +5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.70% | 17.16% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 18.29% | +2.98% |
VAW vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAW vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison
VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than VONE's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAW and VONE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VAW has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to VONE (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs VONE's -34.66%.
On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 15.46% vs 10.67% for VAW. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VONE has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VAW.
VAW has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.03% for VONE.
VAW is categorized as Materials, while VONE is Large Cap Blend Equities. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VAW and 0.08% for VONE.
VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VAW and VONE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer