VAW vs. QQQ
VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VAW returned 10.67%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VAW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
VAW vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAW achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, VAW has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.67%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
VAW
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
VAW vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 13.13% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAW and QQQ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VAW and QQQ has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VAW vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAW
QQQ
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
VAW
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
VAW
QQQ
Industrials
VAW
QQQ
Healthcare
VAW
QQQ
Technology
VAW
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
VAW
QQQ
Energy
VAW
QQQ
Communication Services
VAW
-
QQQ
Financial Services
VAW
-
QQQ
Real Estate
VAW
-
QQQ
Utilities
VAW
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAW vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
VAW
QQQ
VAW vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VAW | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.41 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.44 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 12.79 | -6.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VAW vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAW drawdown since its inception was -62.17%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAW and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAW | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -82.97% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -11.96% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.21% | -22.77% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -35.12% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.13% | -35.12% | -6.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -0.99% | -2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -32.73% | +23.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 3.21% | +1.01% |
Volatility
VAW vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) is 6.50%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that VAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAW | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 8.47% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 14.20% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 17.67% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.70% | 22.64% | -2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 22.43% | -1.16% |
VAW vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAW vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
VAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAW and QQQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to VAW (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAW dropped -62.17% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 10.67% for VAW. On fees, VAW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VAW has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VAW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
VAW has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.
VAW is categorized as Materials, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VAW and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VAW and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer