VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L
VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and LGAG.L (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - VAPX.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD while LGAG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VAPX.L returned 12.69%/yr vs 5.68%/yr for LGAG.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VAPX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGAG.L.
Performance
VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VAPX.L is traded in GBP, while LGAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGAG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAPX.L achieves a 48.85% return, which is significantly higher than LGAG.L's 8.78% return.
VAPX.L
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 48.85%
- 6M
- 53.84%
- 1Y
- 83.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
LGAG.L
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- —
VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 48.85% | 30.80% | -3.74% | 3.63% | -1.84% | 1.30% | 14.91% | 12.74% | -0.27% |
LGAG.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 8.78% | 12.56% | 6.20% | -0.81% | 5.61% | 4.15% | 4.80% | 14.08% | -22.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VAPX.L and LGAG.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2018 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VAPX.L and LGAG.L has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Technology
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Financial Services
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Industrials
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Basic Materials
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Real Estate
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Healthcare
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Consumer Defensive
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Communication Services
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Energy
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Utilities
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VAPX.L
LGAG.L
VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAPX.L | LGAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.28 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.18 | 2.37 | +3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.27 | 6.97 | +16.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAPX.L | LGAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11 | 1.55 | +2.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.28 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.16 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAPX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.88%, smaller than the maximum LGAG.L drawdown of -35.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.L and LGAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAPX.L | LGAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.88% | -35.16% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.47% | -7.24% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.88% | -24.83% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -24.83% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -3.09% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -10.11% | +3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 2.47% | +1.11% |
Volatility
VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a higher volatility of 10.22% compared to L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAG.L) at 3.98%. This indicates that VAPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VAPX.L | LGAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.22% | 3.98% | +6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 8.63% | +9.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.27% | 11.11% | +9.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 20.57% | -4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 22.27% | -4.88% |
VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LGAG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VAPX.L vs. LGAG.L - Dividend Comparison
VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while LGAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGAG.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.54% | 2.36% | 3.20% | 3.30% | 4.12% | 2.99% | 1.81% | 3.28% | 3.55% | 3.07% | 2.71% | 3.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VAPX.L and LGAG.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VAPX.L.
VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while LGAG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VAPX.L and 0.10% for LGAG.L.
Find the right allocation for VAPX.L and LGAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer