PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (VAPX.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAPX.AS achieves a 36.92% return, which is significantly higher than CPXJ.AS's 13.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VAPX.AS has outperformed CPXJ.AS with an annualized return of 10.16%, while CPXJ.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


VAPX.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.69%
6M
28.15%
YTD
36.92%
1Y
56.22%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
10.16%
ALL TIME*
6.43%

CPXJ.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
2.96%
6M
11.50%
YTD
13.48%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
7.08%
ALL TIME*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAPX.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
36.92%24.75%0.85%6.28%-6.99%9.27%9.10%18.78%-9.94%15.92%
CPXJ.AS
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
13.48%6.69%11.90%2.33%-0.55%12.79%-2.03%20.23%-5.97%10.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VAPX.AS and CPXJ.AS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2013

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between VAPX.AS and CPXJ.AS has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAPX.AS
VAPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VAPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CPXJ.AS
CPXJ.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CPXJ.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXJ.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXJ.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXJ.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXJ.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (VAPX.AS) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAPX.ASCPXJ.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

2.70

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

7.77

+4.37

VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAPX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the CPXJ.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAPX.AS and CPXJ.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAPX.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, roughly equal to the maximum CPXJ.AS drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAPX.AS and CPXJ.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAPX.ASCPXJ.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-36.83%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-6.20%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.60%

-19.95%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.60%

-19.95%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.99%

-36.83%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.44%

-0.45%

-13.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-6.62%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.62%

2.16%

+2.46%

Volatility

VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (VAPX.AS) has a higher volatility of 12.75% compared to iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) at 2.34%. This indicates that VAPX.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPXJ.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAPX.ASCPXJ.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.75%

2.34%

+10.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.12%

9.22%

+14.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.01%

11.81%

+14.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

14.62%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

16.41%

+1.93%

VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAPX.AS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CPXJ.AS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VAPX.AS vs. CPXJ.AS - Dividend Comparison

VAPX.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while CPXJ.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPXJ.AS
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAPX.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
2.03%2.75%3.42%3.54%4.46%3.45%2.06%3.31%3.57%3.16%2.85%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAPX.AS and CPXJ.AS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAPX.AS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPXJ.AS.

VAPX.AS tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while CPXJ.AS tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VAPX.AS and 0.20% for CPXJ.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAPX.AS and CPXJ.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer