PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALW.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VALW.L is traded in GBP, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


VALW.L

1D
1.06%
1M
10.28%
YTD
19.31%
6M
21.41%
1Y
47.31%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
14.58%
10Y*

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VALW.L
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
19.31%27.01%5.92%16.43%0.09%20.68%-18.17%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VALW.L and MWRD.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.60

The correlation between VALW.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VALW.L
MWRD.L

Technology

29.7%
24.7%

Financial Services

15.4%
14.7%

Industrials

12.4%
10.6%

Healthcare

9.4%
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
10.5%

Communication Services

8.1%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.7%

Energy

4.1%
4.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.4%

Technology

VALW.L
29.7%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Financial Services

VALW.L
15.4%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Industrials

VALW.L
12.4%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Healthcare

VALW.L
9.4%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VALW.L
8.3%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Communication Services

VALW.L
8.1%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

VALW.L
4.9%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Energy

VALW.L
4.1%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Basic Materials

VALW.L
3.2%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Utilities

VALW.L
2.7%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Real Estate

VALW.L
1.8%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALW.L
VALW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VALW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VALW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VALW.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.68

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VALW.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

Drawdowns

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALW.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

Volatility

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALW.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VALW.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VALW.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VALW.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VALW.L.

VALW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VALW.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALW.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer