PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VALW.L vs. AVGC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VALW.L vs. AVGC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VALW.L is traded in GBP, while AVGC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVGC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALW.L achieves a 19.01% return, which is significantly higher than AVGC.L's 13.58% return.


VALW.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
9.99%
YTD
19.01%
6M
21.67%
1Y
46.02%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*

AVGC.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.81%
YTD
13.58%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALW.L vs. AVGC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VALW.L and AVGC.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.78

The correlation between VALW.L and AVGC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VALW.L vs. AVGC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALW.L
VALW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VALW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VALW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGC.L
AVGC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVGC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALW.L vs. AVGC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) and Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VALW.LAVGC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.52

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.51

5.22

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.41

19.61

+4.80

VALW.L vs. AVGC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the AVGC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALW.L and AVGC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VALW.LAVGC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

2.79

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

3.12

-2.45

Drawdowns

VALW.L vs. AVGC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALW.L drawdown since its inception was -28.59%, which is greater than AVGC.L's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALW.L and AVGC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VALW.LAVGC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.59%

-6.12%

-22.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

-6.12%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.06%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-0.92%

-3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.63%

+0.25%

Volatility

VALW.L vs. AVGC.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L) at 3.62%. This indicates that VALW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VALW.LAVGC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

3.62%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

8.86%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.92%

11.49%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

12.00%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

12.00%

+4.68%

VALW.L vs. AVGC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGC.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VALW.L vs. AVGC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VALW.L nor AVGC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VALW.L and AVGC.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VALW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VALW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AVGC.L.

VALW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while AVGC.L tracks MSCI World IMI Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VALW.L and 0.35% for AVGC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VALW.L and AVGC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer