AVGC.L vs. VT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).

AVGC.L and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AVGC.L is a passively managed fund by Avantis that tracks the performance of the MSCI World IMI Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2024. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both AVGC.L and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AVGC.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AVGC.L vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVGC.L Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	-0.98%	25.16%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	-0.74%	23.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGC.L achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than VT's -0.74% return.

AVGC.L

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -6.86%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: 3.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -4.72%
• YTD: -0.74%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 22.33%
• 3Y*: 17.24%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: 11.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGC.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGC.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

AVGC.L

Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating

VT

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

Return for Risk

AVGC.L vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 74
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 74
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGC.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVGC.L	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.26	0.40	+1.86

Correlation

The correlation between AVGC.L and VT is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AVGC.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

AVGC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVGC.L Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.80%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Drawdowns

AVGC.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGC.L drawdown since its inception was -7.96%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGC.L and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGC.L	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-50.27%	+42.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.19%	-5.97%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.01%	-7.08%	+6.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AVGC.L	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.45%	17.26%	-5.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.45%	15.98%	-4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.45%	17.20%	-5.75%