VALT.TO vs. XEQT.TO
VALT.TO (CI Gold Bullion ETF) and XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - VALT.TO is a Gold fund tracking the No Index (Physical Commodity), while XEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. VALT.TO is passively managed, while XEQT.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VALT.TO returned 16.17%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for XEQT.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VALT.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XEQT.TO.
Performance
VALT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALT.TO achieves a -6.93% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 12.80% return.
VALT.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- -19.64%
- YTD
- -6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.76%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.95%
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.80%
- 1Y
- 24.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
VALT.TO CI Gold Bullion ETF | CA$185.75K | CA$223.40K | CA$363.49K |
| CA$34.26M | CA$38.42M | CA$38.19M |
VALT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALT.TO CI Gold Bullion ETF | -6.93% | 60.46% | 25.58% | 12.35% | 0.92% | -3.19% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 12.80% | 20.57% | 24.38% | 17.27% | -10.99% | 15.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALT.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2021 | 0.16 |
Over the past year, VALT.TO and XEQT.TO have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALT.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VALT.TO
XEQT.TO
VALT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold Bullion ETF (VALT.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VALT.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.37 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 3.02 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 12.68 | -11.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VALT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALT.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALT.TO and XEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALT.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -29.74% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.07% | -8.25% | -18.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.07% | -15.08% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -19.55% | -7.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.75% | -2.15% | -23.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -4.04% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.03% | 1.96% | +10.07% |
Volatility
VALT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Gold Bullion ETF (VALT.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) at 2.90%. This indicates that VALT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALT.TO | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 2.90% | +3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 10.14% | +14.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.23% | 12.37% | +15.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 13.26% | +5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 15.51% | +2.70% |
VALT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VALT.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VALT.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
VALT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VALT.TO CI Gold Bullion ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.61% | 1.66% | 2.03% | 2.09% | 2.14% | 1.66% | 1.69% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VALT.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VALT.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VALT.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XEQT.TO.
VALT.TO is categorized as Gold, while XEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VALT.TO and 0.20% for XEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for VALT.TO and XEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer