VALSX vs. FCGSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VALSX (Value Line Select Growth Fund) and FCGSX (Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VALSX returned 11.03%/yr vs 24.67%/yr for FCGSX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VALSX charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCGSX.

Performance

VALSX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Value Line Select Growth Fund (VALSX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALSX achieves a -5.76% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 23.92% return. Over the past 10 years, VALSX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 11.03%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.67% annualized return.

VALSX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: -5.76%
• 6M: -6.86%
• 1Y: -13.71%
• 3Y*: 6.62%
• 5Y*: 5.26%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

FCGSX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 8.76%
• YTD: 23.92%
• 6M: 25.96%
• 1Y: 56.65%
• 3Y*: 34.73%
• 5Y*: 19.86%
• 10Y*: 24.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VALSX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VALSX Value Line Select Growth Fund	-5.76%	-1.86%	11.90%	31.29%	-20.74%	23.76%	23.07%	36.62%	1.25%	22.34%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	23.92%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VALSX and FCGSX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between VALSX and FCGSX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VALSX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALSX

VALSX Risk / Return Rank: 0
VALSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
VALSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
VALSX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
VALSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
VALSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VALSX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Select Growth Fund (VALSX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VALSX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.14	3.32	-4.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.53	4.10	-5.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.54	-0.72
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	5.62	-6.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	25.64	-26.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VALSX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VALSX Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALSX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VALSX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.14	3.32	-4.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.84	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	1.07	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.98	-0.51

Drawdowns

VALSX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALSX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALSX and FCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VALSX	FCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.08%	-38.77%	-16.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.75%	-10.42%	-8.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.75%	-26.07%	+7.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.22%	-38.77%	+10.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.00%	-38.77%	+4.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.27%	0.00%	-15.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.62%	-6.96%	-6.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.20%	2.28%	+7.92%

Volatility

VALSX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Value Line Select Growth Fund (VALSX) is 3.50%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that VALSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VALSX	FCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	4.38%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	13.35%	-4.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	17.66%	-5.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	23.66%	-6.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	23.24%	-4.96%

VALSX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VALSX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

VALSX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

VALSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than FCGSX's 8.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	8.45%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%
VALSX Value Line Select Growth Fund	9.11%	8.59%	11.16%	9.98%	12.14%	14.47%	27.15%	6.81%	10.12%	7.12%	6.84%	17.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VALSX and FCGSX in my portfolio?

VALSX and FCGSX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VALSX or FCGSX?

FCGSX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to VALSX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VALSX dropped -55.08% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.