VALG vs. QTAP
VALG (Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. VALG is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VALG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
VALG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VALG achieves a 35.93% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 14.67% return.
VALG
- 1D
- -9.01%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 35.93%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
VALG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VALG Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF | 35.93% | 3.65% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.67% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between VALG and QTAP is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VALG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
VALG
QTAP
VALG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long VALE Daily ETF (VALG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VALG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.75 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
VALG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VALG drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALG and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VALG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -29.44% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.33% | -0.10% | -21.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.74% | -5.04% | -6.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility
VALG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VALG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.74% | 5.56% | +70.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.74% | 18.89% | +56.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.74% | 18.77% | +56.97% |
VALG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VALG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
VALG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither VALG nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VALG and QTAP have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VALG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VALG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
VALG and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VALG and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for VALG and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer