VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VAGP.L (Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing) and BCHS.L (Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VAGP.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while BCHS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VAGP.L returned -0.33%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for BCHS.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VAGP.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BCHS.L.

Performance

VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VAGP.L is traded in GBP, while BCHS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BCHS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAGP.L achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than BCHS.L's 25.35% return.

VAGP.L

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 3.26%
• 3Y*: 3.87%
• 5Y*: -0.33%
• 10Y*: —

BCHS.L

• 1D: 5.50%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 25.35%
• 6M: 18.40%
• 1Y: 56.79%
• 3Y*: 41.92%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VAGP.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing	0.30%	4.93%	2.54%	5.85%	-13.82%	-2.05%	5.34%	2.12%
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc	25.35%	35.24%	18.50%	58.28%	-46.25%	26.00%	89.05%	7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VAGP.L and BCHS.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019	0.01

The correlation between VAGP.L and BCHS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAGP.L

VAGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 27
VAGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
VAGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
VAGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
VAGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
VAGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

BCHS.L

BCHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BCHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
BCHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BCHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BCHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VAGP.L	BCHS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.37	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	1.92	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.23	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	1.80	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.10	3.63	-0.53

VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAGP.L and BCHS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAGP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.13%, smaller than the maximum BCHS.L drawdown of -55.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAGP.L and BCHS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VAGP.L	BCHS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.13%	-55.89%	+37.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	-29.49%	+26.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.01%	-35.64%	+31.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.71%	-55.89%	+38.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.65%	-4.94%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-23.07%	+16.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	14.64%	-13.66%

Volatility

VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (VAGP.L) is 1.42%, while Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that VAGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VAGP.L	BCHS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	12.78%	-11.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	26.27%	-23.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38%	38.60%	-35.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.79%	38.27%	-33.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.50%	36.52%	-32.02%

VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAGP.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHS.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

VAGP.L vs. BCHS.L - Dividend Comparison

VAGP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, while BCHS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VAGP.L Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing	3.55%	3.50%	3.08%	2.37%	1.46%	0.86%	1.21%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VAGP.L and BCHS.L in my portfolio?

VAGP.L and BCHS.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VAGP.L or BCHS.L?

On fees, VAGP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VAGP.L or BCHS.L?

VAGP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHS.L.

What is the main difference between VAGP.L and BCHS.L?

VAGP.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while BCHS.L is Technology Equities. VAGP.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while BCHS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VAGP.L and 0.65% for BCHS.L.