PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VABS vs. PMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VABS vs. PMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) and PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VABS achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly higher than PMBS's 1.68% return.


VABS

1D
0.06%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.89%
6M
1.95%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*

PMBS

1D
0.08%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.57%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VABS vs. PMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VABS and PMBS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2024

0.58

The correlation between VABS and PMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VABS vs. PMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VABS
VABS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VABS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VABS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PMBS
PMBS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VABS vs. PMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) and PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VABSPMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

2.22

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

7.04

+3.42

VABS vs. PMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VABS Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the PMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VABS and PMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VABS vs. PMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VABS drawdown since its inception was -7.12%, which is greater than PMBS's maximum drawdown of -4.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VABS and PMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VABSPMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-4.35%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.98%

-2.97%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.79%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-1.15%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.93%

-0.55%

Volatility

VABS vs. PMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) is 0.37%, while PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that VABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VABSPMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

1.34%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.06%

3.24%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01%

4.20%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.30%

4.88%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

4.88%

-2.65%

VABS vs. PMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VABS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PMBS's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

VABS vs. PMBS - Dividend Comparison

VABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than PMBS's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PMBS
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.94%4.73%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
5.06%4.94%5.05%4.13%2.47%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VABS and PMBS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMBS has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to VABS (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VABS dropped -7.12% vs PMBS's -4.35%.

On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 6.57% vs 3.97% for VABS. On fees, VABS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, VABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 6.57% return vs 3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VABS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.

VABS has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 4.94% for PMBS.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VABS and 0.71% for PMBS.

VABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VABS and PMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer