PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VABS vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VABS vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VABS achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 1.20% return.


VABS

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.13%
6M
1.54%
YTD
2.04%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.14%

PFFA

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.04%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
1.20%
1Y
6.02%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.74M$17.23M$20.45M
$47.74K$55.28K$583.29K

VABS vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
2.04%5.40%7.59%7.61%-5.24%0.37%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
1.20%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%19.29%

Correlation

The correlation between VABS and PFFA is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2021

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VABS vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VABS
VABS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VABS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VABS vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VABSPFFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.14

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

0.89

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.93

2.56

+7.38

VABS vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VABS Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VABS and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VABS vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VABS drawdown since its inception was -7.12%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VABS and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VABSPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-70.52%

+63.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.98%

-6.49%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.42%

-12.15%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.12%

-22.70%

+15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-3.29%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-6.57%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

2.25%

-1.87%

Volatility

VABS vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) is 0.47%, while Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) has a volatility of 2.32%. This indicates that VABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VABSPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

2.32%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

6.46%

-5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

7.62%

-5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.31%

11.59%

-9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.22%

31.55%

-29.33%

VABS vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VABS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

VABS vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

VABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than PFFA's 9.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.98%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
5.03%4.94%5.05%4.13%2.47%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VABS and PFFA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFA has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to VABS (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VABS dropped -7.12% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

On 5-year performance, PFFA leads with 5.57% vs 3.26% for VABS. On fees, VABS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, VABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFFA has performed better with a 5.57% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VABS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.98%, compared with 5.03% for VABS.

VABS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while PFFA is Preferred Stock. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VABS and 1.47% for PFFA.

VABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VABS and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer