PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VA.TO vs. ESIH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VA.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF) and ESIH.L (iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VA.TO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, while ESIH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VA.TO returned 12.79%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for ESIH.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VA.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIH.L.

Performance

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VA.TO is traded in CAD, while ESIH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIH.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VA.TO achieves a 29.12% return, which is significantly higher than ESIH.L's 0.58% return.

VA.TO

1D
0.34%
1M
2.30%
YTD
29.12%
6M
29.94%
1Y
52.99%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
11.51%

ESIH.L

1D
0.85%
1M
4.26%
YTD
0.58%
6M
1.65%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
7.77%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF		29.12%26.08%10.31%12.16%-9.26%0.89%4.35%
ESIH.L
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF		0.58%15.75%6.08%8.39%-3.55%15.97%-10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VA.TO and ESIH.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020

0.33

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VA.TO
ESIH.L

Technology

22.4%

-

Industrials

20.6%

-

Financial Services

19.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%

-

Basic Materials

7.2%

-

Healthcare

5.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

4.8%

-

Real Estate

4.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.5%

-

Energy

1.6%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Technology

VA.TO
22.4%
ESIH.L

-

Industrials

VA.TO
20.6%
ESIH.L

-

Financial Services

VA.TO
19.4%
ESIH.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

VA.TO
9.7%
ESIH.L

-

Basic Materials

VA.TO
7.2%
ESIH.L

-

Healthcare

VA.TO
5.0%
ESIH.L
100.0%

Communication Services

VA.TO
4.8%
ESIH.L

-

Real Estate

VA.TO
4.3%
ESIH.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VA.TO
3.5%
ESIH.L

-

Energy

VA.TO
1.6%
ESIH.L

-

Utilities

VA.TO
1.6%
ESIH.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF

iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF

Often compared with VA.TO:
VA.TO vs. VE.TOVA.TO vs. VPLVA.TO vs. XEF.TOVA.TO vs. XEQT.TOVA.TO vs. VIDY.TOVA.TO vs. VFV.TOVA.TO vs. SPWO
Often compared with ESIH.L:
ESIH.L vs. DRDR.LESIH.L vs. INRG.LESIH.L vs. XSHC.LESIH.L vs. HLTH.LESIH.L vs. VOOESIH.L vs. IITU.LESIH.L vs. ESIH.DE

Return for Risk

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VA.TO
VA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
ESIH.L
ESIH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VA.TOESIH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.48
0.41

+2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.18
0.71

+2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.09

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

0.53

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.07

1.27

+14.80

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VA.TO and ESIH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VA.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.81%, which is greater than ESIH.L's maximum drawdown of -23.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VA.TO and ESIH.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VA.TOESIH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.81%

-23.52%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-14.29%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.99%

-22.07%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.73%

-23.52%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.81%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-8.26%

+6.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-7.77%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

5.96%

-2.76%

Volatility

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) at 5.10%. This indicates that VA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VA.TOESIH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

5.10%

+4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

13.74%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.76%

18.58%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

19.64%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

19.81%

-4.45%

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VA.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIH.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VA.TO vs. ESIH.L - Dividend Comparison

VA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while ESIH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESIH.L
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF		1.68%2.17%2.31%2.57%3.10%2.35%2.14%2.55%2.89%1.71%1.63%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

VA.TO and ESIH.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIH.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIH.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VA.TO.

VA.TO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ESIH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. VA.TO tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, while ESIH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VA.TO and 0.18% for ESIH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VA.TO and ESIH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer