V3PL.DE vs. CEBL.DE
V3PL.DE (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing) and CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - V3PL.DE tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice while CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V3PL.DE returned 19.01%/yr vs 22.99%/yr for CEBL.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. V3PL.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CEBL.DE.
Performance
V3PL.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with V3PL.DE having a 31.53% return and CEBL.DE slightly higher at 31.90%.
V3PL.DE
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 31.53%
- 6M
- 33.98%
- 1Y
- 50.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 34.52%
- 1Y
- 55.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
V3PL.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V3PL.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing | 31.53% | 16.39% | 7.41% | 10.31% | 3.85% |
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | 4.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between V3PL.DE and CEBL.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between V3PL.DE and CEBL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V3PL.DE vs. CEBL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
V3PL.DE
CEBL.DE
V3PL.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V3PL.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.50 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 4.83 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.17 | 17.67 | -0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V3PL.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 2.81 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.43 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
V3PL.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V3PL.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.66%, smaller than the maximum CEBL.DE drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3PL.DE and CEBL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V3PL.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.66% | -35.09% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -11.43% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -20.53% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -2.85% | +0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -11.09% | +8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.13% | -0.21% |
Volatility
V3PL.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE) is 6.84%, while iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that V3PL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V3PL.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 8.24% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 16.36% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 19.68% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 18.48% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 18.94% | -3.70% |
V3PL.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
V3PL.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CEBL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
V3PL.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Dividend Comparison
V3PL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
V3PL.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing | 1.42% | 1.90% | 2.16% | 2.13% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
V3PL.DE and CEBL.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V3PL.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V3PL.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
V3PL.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice, while CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for V3PL.DE and 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
Find the right allocation for V3PL.DE and CEBL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer