V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

V3PA.DE (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - V3PA.DE tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice while LCUA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V3PA.DE returned 19.30%/yr vs 22.72%/yr for LCUA.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. V3PA.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LCUA.DE.

Performance

V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with V3PA.DE having a 31.55% return and LCUA.DE slightly higher at 31.85%.

V3PA.DE

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 7.31%
• YTD: 31.55%
• 6M: 33.90%
• 1Y: 51.00%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCUA.DE

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 31.85%
• 6M: 32.05%
• 1Y: 53.21%
• 3Y*: 22.72%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
V3PA.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	31.55%	16.47%	7.66%	10.91%	3.89%
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc	31.85%	18.08%	18.51%	3.26%	4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between V3PA.DE and LCUA.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022	0.66

The correlation between V3PA.DE and LCUA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3PA.DE

V3PA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 85
V3PA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
V3PA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
V3PA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 86
V3PA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
V3PA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

LCUA.DE

LCUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LCUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
LCUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
LCUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
LCUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	V3PA.DE	LCUA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.72	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	3.59	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.49	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.43	4.49	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.46	16.33	+0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3PA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3PA.DE and LCUA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	V3PA.DE	LCUA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.72	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.48	+0.77

Drawdowns

V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3PA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum LCUA.DE drawdown of -33.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3PA.DE and LCUA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	V3PA.DE	LCUA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.58%	-33.18%	+15.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.44%	-12.13%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.58%	-21.07%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	-2.86%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-12.02%	+9.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	3.34%	-0.26%

Volatility

V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) is 6.33%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that V3PA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	V3PA.DE	LCUA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	8.54%	-2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.56%	17.04%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.10%	20.08%	-1.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.34%	18.48%	-3.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.34%	19.46%	-4.12%

V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3PA.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

V3PA.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither V3PA.DE nor LCUA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both V3PA.DE and LCUA.DE in my portfolio?

V3PA.DE and LCUA.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, V3PA.DE or LCUA.DE?

On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, V3PA.DE or LCUA.DE?

LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for V3PA.DE.

What is the main difference between V3PA.DE and LCUA.DE?

V3PA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice, while LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for V3PA.DE and 0.12% for LCUA.DE.