V3PA.DE vs. BATF.DE
V3PA.DE (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and BATF.DE (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - V3PA.DE tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice while BATF.DE tracks the Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V3PA.DE returned 19.30%/yr vs 7.05%/yr for BATF.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. V3PA.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for BATF.DE.
Performance
V3PA.DE vs. BATF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V3PA.DE achieves a 31.55% return, which is significantly higher than BATF.DE's 2.86% return.
V3PA.DE
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 31.55%
- 6M
- 33.90%
- 1Y
- 51.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BATF.DE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
V3PA.DE vs. BATF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V3PA.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 31.55% | 16.47% | 7.66% | 10.91% | 3.00% |
BATF.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF | 2.86% | 8.25% | 10.50% | -0.71% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between V3PA.DE and BATF.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.69 |
The correlation between V3PA.DE and BATF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V3PA.DE vs. BATF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
V3PA.DE
BATF.DE
V3PA.DE vs. BATF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V3PA.DE | BATF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.11 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | 1.13 | +3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.46 | 2.74 | +13.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V3PA.DE | BATF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 0.61 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.51 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
V3PA.DE vs. BATF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V3PA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum BATF.DE drawdown of -18.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3PA.DE and BATF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V3PA.DE | BATF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.58% | -18.62% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -6.47% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.58% | -18.62% | +1.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -5.63% | +3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -5.59% | +2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.68% | +0.40% |
Volatility
V3PA.DE vs. BATF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan ESG Exclusions Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Accumulating ETF (BATF.DE) at 3.62%. This indicates that V3PA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V3PA.DE | BATF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 3.62% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.56% | 8.97% | +6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 12.09% | +6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 14.45% | +0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 14.45% | +0.89% |
V3PA.DE vs. BATF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
V3PA.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than BATF.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
V3PA.DE vs. BATF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither V3PA.DE nor BATF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
V3PA.DE and BATF.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BATF.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BATF.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for V3PA.DE.
V3PA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice, while BATF.DE tracks Foxberry Sustainability Consensus Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for V3PA.DE and 0.16% for BATF.DE.
Find the right allocation for V3PA.DE and BATF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer