PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3GP.L vs. SUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3GP.L vs. SUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

V3GP.L is traded in GBP, while SUSA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SUSA values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3GP.L achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than SUSA's 11.96% return.


V3GP.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.75%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.77%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*

SUSA

1D
0.36%
1M
6.21%
YTD
11.96%
6M
10.24%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
15.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3GP.L vs. SUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
V3GP.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
0.59%6.20%3.56%7.64%-14.57%1.05%
SUSA
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
11.96%7.48%24.57%17.69%-12.03%20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between V3GP.L and SUSA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3GP.L vs. SUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3GP.L
V3GP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
V3GP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SUSA
SUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3GP.L vs. SUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3GP.LSUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.44

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.44

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

12.98

-7.41

V3GP.L vs. SUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3GP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the SUSA Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3GP.L and SUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V3GP.LSUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.39

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.82

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.69

-0.59

Drawdowns

V3GP.L vs. SUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3GP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.15%, smaller than the maximum SUSA drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3GP.L and SUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3GP.LSUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.15%

-32.78%

+12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-8.19%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.83%

-22.41%

+18.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-22.41%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.16%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-5.12%

-2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.17%

-1.39%

Volatility

V3GP.L vs. SUSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) is 1.43%, while iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that V3GP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3GP.LSUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

2.84%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

8.72%

-5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60%

11.81%

-8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.42%

16.10%

-10.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

18.12%

-12.70%

V3GP.L vs. SUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3GP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SUSA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3GP.L vs. SUSA - Dividend Comparison

V3GP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than SUSA's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SUSA
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
0.82%0.89%1.15%1.32%1.52%0.98%1.17%1.52%1.72%1.40%1.56%1.42%
V3GP.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
4.37%4.43%4.36%4.10%2.48%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


V3GP.L and SUSA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSA.

V3GP.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while SUSA is Large Cap Growth Equities. V3GP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while SUSA tracks MSCI USA ESG Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for V3GP.L and 0.25% for SUSA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3GP.L and SUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer