PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
V3GP.L vs. QQQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


V3GP.LQQQM
YTD Return279.34%26.13%
1Y Return302.92%36.89%
3Y Return (Ann)66.98%10.06%
Sharpe Ratio3.202.29
Sortino Ratio58.043.00
Omega Ratio8.181.41
Calmar Ratio123.252.94
Martin Ratio326.7910.75
Ulcer Index0.93%3.71%
Daily Std Dev94.57%17.31%
Max Drawdown-20.15%-35.05%
Current Drawdown-0.73%-0.06%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between V3GP.L and QQQM is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

V3GP.L vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, V3GP.L achieves a 279.34% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 26.13% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
291.82%
16.36%
V3GP.L
QQQM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


V3GP.L vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both V3GP.L and QQQM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


V3GP.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
Expense ratio chart for V3GP.L: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for QQQM: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

V3GP.L vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3GP.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for V3GP.L, currently valued at 3.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for V3GP.L, currently valued at 29.90, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0029.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for V3GP.L, currently valued at 4.71, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.004.71
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for V3GP.L, currently valued at 56.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0056.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for V3GP.L, currently valued at 161.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00161.47
QQQM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QQQM, currently valued at 9.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.16

V3GP.L vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3GP.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is higher than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3GP.L and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.25
1.99
V3GP.L
QQQM

Dividends

V3GP.L vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

V3GP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.77%, more than QQQM's 0.64% yield.


TTM2023202220212020
V3GP.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing
109.77%4.10%96.35%71.35%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.64%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Drawdowns

V3GP.L vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3GP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.15%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3GP.L and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.99%
-0.06%
V3GP.L
QQQM

Volatility

V3GP.L vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) is 2.93%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that V3GP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.93%
5.16%
V3GP.L
QQQM