V3GP.L vs. INFR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

V3GP.L (Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - V3GP.L is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while INFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V3GP.L returned 5.34%/yr vs 2.99%/yr for INFR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. V3GP.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.

Performance

V3GP.L vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

V3GP.L is traded in GBP, while INFR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INFR values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3GP.L achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than INFR's 1.82% return.

V3GP.L

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: 4.36%
• 3Y*: 5.34%
• 5Y*: 0.47%
• 10Y*: —

INFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 8.67%
• 3Y*: 2.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3GP.L vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
V3GP.L Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing	0.59%	6.20%	3.56%	7.64%	-1.56%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.82%	15.16%	-4.59%	-0.06%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between V3GP.L and INFR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2022	0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between V3GP.L and INFR has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

V3GP.L vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3GP.L

V3GP.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
V3GP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
V3GP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
V3GP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
V3GP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
V3GP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 37

INFR

INFR Risk / Return Rank: 27
INFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
INFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
INFR Omega Ratio Rank: 31
INFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
INFR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3GP.L vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	V3GP.L	INFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.06	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.56	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.19	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	1.57	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	4.21	+1.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

V3GP.L vs. INFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3GP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the INFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3GP.L and INFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	V3GP.L	INFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.06	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.27	-0.17

Drawdowns

V3GP.L vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3GP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.15%, which is greater than INFR's maximum drawdown of -16.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3GP.L and INFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	V3GP.L	INFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.15%	-16.73%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.67%	-5.85%	+3.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.83%	-14.57%	+10.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-1.75%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.78%	-5.24%	-2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	2.15%	-1.37%

Volatility

V3GP.L vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing (V3GP.L) is 1.43%, while ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that V3GP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	V3GP.L	INFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	1.76%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.80%	5.23%	-2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.60%	8.63%	-5.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.42%	12.66%	-7.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.42%	12.66%	-7.24%

V3GP.L vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3GP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

V3GP.L vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

V3GP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than INFR's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	2.49%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%
V3GP.L Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Distributing	4.37%	4.43%	4.36%	4.10%	2.48%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both V3GP.L and INFR in my portfolio?

V3GP.L and INFR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, V3GP.L or INFR?

On fees, V3GP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, V3GP.L or INFR?

V3GP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.

What is the main difference between V3GP.L and INFR?

V3GP.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while INFR is Energy Equities. V3GP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for V3GP.L and 0.59% for INFR.