V0IH.DE vs. XDG7.DE
V0IH.DE (VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A) and XDG7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both Energy Equities funds - V0IH.DE tracks the MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped while XDG7.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V0IH.DE returned 18.80%/yr vs 4.63%/yr for XDG7.DE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
V0IH.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V0IH.DE achieves a 55.27% return, which is significantly higher than XDG7.DE's 34.27% return.
V0IH.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 55.27%
- 6M
- 44.59%
- 1Y
- 95.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDG7.DE
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 34.27%
- 6M
- 33.11%
- 1Y
- 73.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
V0IH.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
V0IH.DE VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A | 55.27% | -0.77% | -6.42% | 13.18% |
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 34.27% | 23.57% | -15.19% | -18.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between V0IH.DE and XDG7.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023 | 0.29 |
The correlation between V0IH.DE and XDG7.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V0IH.DE vs. XDG7.DE — Risk / Return Rank
V0IH.DE
XDG7.DE
V0IH.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V0IH.DE | XDG7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.56 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.49 | 4.19 | +6.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.98 | 10.86 | +14.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V0IH.DE | XDG7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | 2.40 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.06 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
V0IH.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V0IH.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.39%, smaller than the maximum XDG7.DE drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V0IH.DE and XDG7.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V0IH.DE | XDG7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.39% | -48.68% | +4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -17.21% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.39% | -43.66% | -0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -2.95% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -26.59% | +11.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 6.64% | -2.82% |
Volatility
V0IH.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) at 7.88%. This indicates that V0IH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDG7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V0IH.DE | XDG7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 7.88% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.57% | 13.49% | +7.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.00% | 30.00% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 24.08% | +5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 24.08% | +5.61% |
V0IH.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both V0IH.DE and XDG7.DE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
V0IH.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither V0IH.DE nor XDG7.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
V0IH.DE and XDG7.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V0IH.DE and XDG7.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
V0IH.DE tracks MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped, while XDG7.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for V0IH.DE and XDG7.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer