V0IH.DE vs. IEMA.L
V0IH.DE (VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A) and IEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - V0IH.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped, while IEMA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V0IH.DE returned 18.80%/yr vs 20.80%/yr for IEMA.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. V0IH.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IEMA.L.
Performance
V0IH.DE vs. IEMA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
V0IH.DE is traded in EUR, while IEMA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IEMA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V0IH.DE achieves a 55.27% return, which is significantly higher than IEMA.L's 27.05% return.
V0IH.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 55.27%
- 6M
- 44.59%
- 1Y
- 95.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEMA.L
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 27.05%
- 6M
- 28.11%
- 1Y
- 48.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
V0IH.DE vs. IEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
V0IH.DE VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A | 55.27% | -0.77% | -6.42% | 13.18% |
IEMA.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 27.05% | 18.46% | 14.71% | 4.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between V0IH.DE and IEMA.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023 | 0.28 |
The correlation between V0IH.DE and IEMA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V0IH.DE vs. IEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank
V0IH.DE
IEMA.L
V0IH.DE vs. IEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V0IH.DE | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.49 | 4.61 | +5.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.98 | 16.47 | +8.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V0IH.DE | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | 2.62 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.39 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
V0IH.DE vs. IEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V0IH.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.39%, which is greater than IEMA.L's maximum drawdown of -35.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V0IH.DE and IEMA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V0IH.DE | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.39% | -35.69% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -10.75% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.39% | -18.12% | -26.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -2.57% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -10.76% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 3.02% | +0.80% |
Volatility
V0IH.DE vs. IEMA.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) at 8.03%. This indicates that V0IH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V0IH.DE | IEMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 8.03% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.57% | 16.03% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.00% | 18.95% | +10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 17.34% | +12.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 18.88% | +10.81% |
V0IH.DE vs. IEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
V0IH.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMA.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
V0IH.DE vs. IEMA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither V0IH.DE nor IEMA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
V0IH.DE and IEMA.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEMA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for V0IH.DE.
V0IH.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while IEMA.L is Emerging Markets Equities. V0IH.DE tracks MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped, while IEMA.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for V0IH.DE and 0.18% for IEMA.L.
Find the right allocation for V0IH.DE and IEMA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer