IEMA.L vs. FBTU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) and First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L).
IEMA.L and FBTU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IEMA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. FBTU.L is managed by First Trust.
Performance
IEMA.L vs. FBTU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IEMA.L vs. FBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMA.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.92% | 34.41% | 7.61% | 9.43% | -20.23% | -2.83% | 43.11% |
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating | -2.90% | 25.95% | 4.74% | 3.91% | -5.96% | -3.77% | 3.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMA.L achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than FBTU.L's -2.90% return.
IEMA.L
- 1D
- 4.28%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 35.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
FBTU.L
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 21.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEMA.L vs. FBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTU.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IEMA.L vs. FBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEMA.L
FBTU.L
IEMA.L vs. FBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) and First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEMA.L | FBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 0.92 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 1.39 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.17 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 1.58 | +1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.15 | 4.69 | +5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEMA.L | FBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.92 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.22 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.18 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMA.L and FBTU.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IEMA.L vs. FBTU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IEMA.L nor FBTU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IEMA.L vs. FBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, which is greater than FBTU.L's maximum drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMA.L and FBTU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMA.L | FBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -33.73% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -14.30% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.08% | -29.97% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.93% | -9.15% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.43% | -13.30% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 4.82% | -1.33% |
Volatility
IEMA.L vs. FBTU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) at 7.44%. This indicates that IEMA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IEMA.L | FBTU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 7.44% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 15.12% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.13% | 23.07% | -3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 20.73% | -2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 21.28% | -1.95% |