PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V0IH.DE vs. COPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V0IH.DE vs. COPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

V0IH.DE is traded in EUR, while COPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the COPG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


V0IH.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
1.36%
YTD
55.27%
6M
44.59%
1Y
95.72%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
10Y*

COPG.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V0IH.DE vs. COPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V0IH.DE
V0IH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
V0IH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
V0IH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

COPG.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V0IH.DE vs. COPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services UCITS ETF A (V0IH.DE) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V0IH.DECOPG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.98

V0IH.DE vs. COPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V0IH.DECOPG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

Drawdowns

V0IH.DE vs. COPG.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V0IH.DECOPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

Volatility

V0IH.DE vs. COPG.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V0IH.DECOPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.69%

V0IH.DE vs. COPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V0IH.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

V0IH.DE vs. COPG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither V0IH.DE nor COPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, V0IH.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V0IH.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPG.L.

V0IH.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while COPG.L is Commodity Producers Equities. V0IH.DE tracks MarketVector US Listed Oil Services 10% Capped, while COPG.L tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for V0IH.DE and 0.65% for COPG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V0IH.DE and COPG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer