UYM vs. MUU
UYM (ProShares Ultra Basic Materials) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UYM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UYM charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
UYM vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UYM
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 22.19%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UYM vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials | -5.62% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between UYM and MUU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UYM vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
UYM
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UYM vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UYM | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UYM vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UYM | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.77% | -26.28% | -66.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.50% | -26.28% | +14.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.02% | -10.19% | -31.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.03% | — | — |
Volatility
UYM vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UYM | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.13% | 295.32% | -260.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.40% | 295.32% | -255.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.77% | 295.32% | -252.55% |
UYM vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
UYM vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials | 1.24% | 1.47% | 0.98% | 0.28% | 0.88% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 1.24% | 0.94% | 0.38% | 0.55% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UYM and MUU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UYM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UYM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
UYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UYM and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for UYM and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer