PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYM vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UYM vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UYM vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
19.41%-1.90%
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
-21.97%96.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYM achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than AMDG's -21.97% return.


UYM

1D
3.66%
1M
-12.40%
YTD
19.41%
6M
21.51%
1Y
26.73%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
12.56%

AMDG

1D
7.34%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-21.97%
6M
16.89%
1Y
133.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UYM vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UYM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UYM vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYM
UYM Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYM vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UYMAMDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.04

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

2.13

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.32

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.16

4.53

-1.37

UYM vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYM Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYM and AMDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UYMAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.04

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.35

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between UYM and AMDG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UYM vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than AMDG's 14.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
1.27%1.47%0.98%0.28%0.88%0.52%0.56%1.24%0.94%0.38%0.55%0.42%
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
14.36%11.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UYM vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYM drawdown since its inception was -92.77%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYM and AMDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UYMAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.77%

-63.04%

-29.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.11%

-56.48%

+28.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.51%

-52.31%

+38.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.41%

-27.66%

-14.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.09%

28.88%

-19.79%

Volatility

UYM vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) is 12.63%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 33.06%. This indicates that UYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UYMAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.63%

33.06%

-20.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.94%

98.59%

-73.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.02%

129.74%

-87.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.32%

124.94%

-85.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.73%

124.94%

-82.21%