UYLD vs. TRBF
UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) and TRBF (Angel Oak Total Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UYLD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while TRBF is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UYLD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TRBF.
Performance
UYLD vs. TRBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UYLD achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than TRBF's 0.52% return.
UYLD
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRBF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UYLD vs. TRBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.95% | 1.14% |
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF | 0.52% | 0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between UYLD and TRBF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UYLD vs. TRBF — Risk / Return Rank
UYLD
TRBF
UYLD vs. TRBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and Angel Oak Total Return ETF (TRBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UYLD | TRBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 37.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 225.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UYLD | TRBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.99 | 0.61 | +5.38 |
Drawdowns
UYLD vs. TRBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYLD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum TRBF drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYLD and TRBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UYLD | TRBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -2.59% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.48% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.80% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | — | — |
Volatility
UYLD vs. TRBF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UYLD | TRBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65% | 3.76% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 3.76% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 3.76% | -2.76% |
UYLD vs. TRBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYLD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TRBF's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
UYLD vs. TRBF - Dividend Comparison
UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than TRBF's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF | 3.14% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 5.03% | 5.07% | 4.97% | 5.92% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UYLD and TRBF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TRBF.
UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 3.14% for TRBF.
UYLD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TRBF is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UYLD and 0.44% for TRBF.
Find the right allocation for UYLD and TRBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer