UYLD vs. FJP
UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) and FJP (First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UYLD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while FJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index. UYLD is actively managed, while FJP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UYLD returned 5.92%/yr vs 19.57%/yr for FJP. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UYLD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FJP.
Performance
UYLD vs. FJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UYLD achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than FJP's 12.56% return.
UYLD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FJP
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
UYLD vs. FJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 2.03% | 5.36% | 6.10% | 6.90% | 1.09% |
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 12.56% | 33.60% | 5.80% | 23.00% | 13.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between UYLD and FJP is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022 | 0.10 |
The correlation between UYLD and FJP shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UYLD vs. FJP — Risk / Return Rank
UYLD
FJP
UYLD vs. FJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) and First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UYLD | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +19.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.49 | 1.27 | +3.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 37.30 | 2.22 | +35.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 226.63 | 6.55 | +220.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UYLD vs. FJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UYLD drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum FJP drawdown of -41.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYLD and FJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UYLD | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -41.51% | +40.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.14% | -14.43% | +14.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.54% | -17.02% | +16.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.75% | +7.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -11.45% | +11.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 4.89% | -4.87% |
Volatility
UYLD vs. FJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) is 0.36%, while First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that UYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UYLD | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 7.16% | -6.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.50% | 17.43% | -16.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64% | 21.00% | -20.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 20.43% | -19.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.00% | 18.91% | -17.91% |
UYLD vs. FJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
UYLD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FJP's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
UYLD vs. FJP - Dividend Comparison
UYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than FJP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 2.53% | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 2.80% | 1.54% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 0.85% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 5.03% | 5.07% | 4.97% | 5.92% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UYLD and FJP have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FJP has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to UYLD (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYLD dropped -0.54% vs FJP's -41.51%.
On 3-year performance, FJP leads with 19.57% vs 5.92% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FJP has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.
UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 2.53% for FJP.
UYLD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FJP is Japan Equities. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for UYLD and 0.80% for FJP.
UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.03 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UYLD and FJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer