UXRP vs. EINC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg XRP Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UXRP returned -95.01% vs 33.52% for EINC. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. UXRP charges 1.67%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

UXRP vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXRP achieves a -76.11% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 29.71% return.

UXRP

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: -21.61%
• 6M: -80.47%
• YTD: -76.11%
• 1Y: -95.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 5.79%
• 6M: 28.55%
• YTD: 29.71%
• 1Y: 33.52%
• 3Y*: 29.16%
• 5Y*: 23.13%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXRP vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF	-76.11%	-77.43%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	29.71%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between UXRP and EINC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

UXRP vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXRP

UXRP Risk / Return Rank: 2
UXRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
UXRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
UXRP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
UXRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
UXRP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 82
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXRP vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UXRP	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	2.18	-2.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.90	2.94	-4.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.38	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	4.27	-5.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	10.48	-11.69

UXRP vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UXRP Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UXRP and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UXRP vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.60%, which is greater than EINC's maximum drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXRP and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXRP	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.60%	-87.55%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.60%	-7.89%	-88.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.21%	-1.67%	-94.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.04%	-43.97%	-30.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	78.15%	3.21%	+74.94%

Volatility

UXRP vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) has a higher volatility of 27.05% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 5.40%. This indicates that UXRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UXRP	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.05%	5.40%	+21.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	103.11%	12.38%	+90.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	146.10%	15.45%	+130.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	145.88%	19.58%	+126.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	145.88%	25.33%	+120.55%

UXRP vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXRP has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXRP vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

UXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than EINC's 3.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.41%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXRP and EINC in my portfolio?

UXRP and EINC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UXRP or EINC?

UXRP has higher volatility (27.05%) compared to EINC (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXRP dropped -96.60% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, UXRP or EINC?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 33.52% vs -95.01% for UXRP. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UXRP or EINC?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 33.52% return vs -95.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXRP or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXRP or EINC?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.

What is the main difference between UXRP and EINC?

UXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while EINC is Energy Equities. UXRP tracks Bloomberg XRP Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.67% for UXRP and 0.45% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.